Tiffany Haddish Calls Out Grammys for ‘Disrespectful’ Hosting Gig Without Pay, Recording Academy Issues Apology

Tiffany Haddish turned down a hosting gig with the 63rd Annual Grammy Awards set for Jan. 31, 2021, and now the Recording Academy is apologizing for what Haddish calls a “disrespectful” offer.

The comedian revealed in an interview with Variety Wednesday, Dec. 9, that she refused to take a job hosting the Grammys pre-telecast premiere ceremony after being informed that she would incur all expenses pertaining to the event — including hair, clothing and makeup — all while receiving no payment for her time.

Tiffany Haddish became emotional while she talked about being abused by her mother as a child. (Photo: @tiffanyhaddish/Instagram)

“All of that would have to come out of my pocket,” she explained. “I don’t know if this might mean I might not get nominated ever again, but I think it’s disrespectful.”

Haddish is nominated for best comedy album for Netflix’s “Black Mitzvah” after receiving her first nomination in 2018 in the spoken word category for “The Last Black Unicorn.”

“I was like, ‘The exposure is amazing but I think I have enough. I appreciate you guys asking,’ ” Haddish said. “And as much as I appreciate the honor of being nominated, that’s not okay.”

Following Haddish’s grievances becoming public, a representative for the Recording Academy released a statement after being contacted by Variety. The statement read, “the Premiere Ceremony is not a CBS program and is hosted by the Academy — a not-for-profit organization — and that all hosts, presenters, and performers have traditionally performed gratis, including this year.”  The representative also mentioned that the situation would not affect future nominations for Haddish.

Then on Thursday morning, Harvey Mason Jr., Recording Academy interim president and CEO, shared an Instagram video in which he apologized to Haddish. Mason said without his knowledge an academy talent booker told Haddish they wouldn’t cover the costs.

“To me, that was wrong,” he said. “I’m frustrated by that decision. It was a lapse in judgment. It was in poor taste, and it was disrespectful to the creative … I’m part of the creative community. I know what that feels like, and it’s not right.”

Mason said Haddish was “gracious enough to allow” him to speak with her, during an exchange in which he apologized to the star personally.

“I apologized to her personally and I apologized to her from the academy. I expressed to her my regret and my displeasure about how this went down and about how it was handled,” said Mason. “Again, I want to say, Tiffany, we are sorry and thank you for allowing me to speak on it.”

Haddish has not provided further comment, but remarked to Variety that her experience is something the Academy needs to evaluate in case similar incidents have occurred.

“This is something that needs to be addressed,” Haddish said. “How many other people have they done that to? It’s like a guy asking you on a date but telling you that you have to pay for it.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top