Gabrielle Union Reaches Settlement With ‘America’s Got Talent’ Over Toxic Workplace Claims

Gabrielle Union and NBC have reportedly reached a settlement over her allegations of a “toxic work environment” at “America’s Got Talent” that led to her subsequent exit as a judge.

An NBC spokesperson recently told Page Six: “We’ve reached an amicable resolution. NBC Entertainment appreciates the important concerns raised by Gabrielle Union and remains committed to ensuring an inclusive and supportive working environment where people of all backgrounds can be treated with respect.”

Gabrielle Union has reached a settlement with NBC over her claims that “America’s Got Talent” allowed a toxic workplace. (Photo: @gabunion/Instagram)

Although the settlement amount is undisclosed, Page Six reports that the settlement will be paid out by “America’s Got Talent” production companies Fremantle, NBC, and Syco.

As a recap, the controversy began last September when reports surfaced that Union was not being brought back to the show despite having two more option years — at the network’s discretion — left on her contract. Union suggested on social media that she felt blindsided by the decision.

She also hinted that something more nefarious was afoot: “There are some people who want the wheels of change to come to a grinding halt because they feel that their privilege is being challenged,” she said during a revelatory interview with Variety in May.

In the months after her departure, Union spoke publicly about what she believed was a toxic, racist work environment. Among the stories she told about AGT were her concerns about on-set racist behavior being dismissed by producers. According to Union, she witnessed a contestant wearing blackface — a white performer doing a Beyoncé impression with hands darkened by makeup — without repercussions, Jay Leno telling a racist joke with impunity, and being told by producers that her hairstyles were “too Black.” She also claimed that Simon Cowell was allowed to smoke indoors freely (which is illegal in workplaces in the state of California).

When Union’s allegations surfaced, NBC and Fremantle publicly professed ignorance of the toxic work environment, and vowed to take the claims “extremely seriously.”

Union refused to back down from her claims, saying that she viewed it as her responsibility to hold Hollywood accountable. “My goal is to create the happiest, most high-functioning, inclusive, protected and healthy example of a workplace,” she told Variety.

Union’s husband, Dwyane Wade, also became involved in the controversy, defending her honor from his Twitter account. “Over this past year I’ve been approached by many people saying that my wife is the main reason they’ve started watching #AGT or that they love her insight and sincerity on the show,” he tweeted. He then followed up by adding, “As proud as I [was] of her being selected as a judge on #AGT— I am even more proud of her standing up for what she stands for and that’s US.”

NBC eventually hired an outside investigator to look into Union’s claims. But according to NBC, the outside investigator apparently found that “no one associated with the show made any insensitive or derogatory remarks about Ms. Union’s appearance, and that neither race nor gender was a contributing factor in the advancement or elimination of contestants at any time.”

It seems that even if NBC denied any claims of wrongdoing, the company felt the desire to bring the entire saga to an end via a settlement.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top