Descendants of Tulsa Massacre Victims Seek Reparations in New Lawsuit Against the City

On Tuesday, attorneys representing the victims and descendants of victims of the Tulsa Race Massacre filed a lawsuit against the city of Tulsa. The plaintiffs are seeking reparations nearly 100 years after the city’s iconic Black Wall Street was burned and destroyed by white mobs.

Attorney Damario Solomon-Simmons, who is leading the suit, which was filed Sept. 1 in state court, says that much of Tulsa’s spotted racial history emanates from the massacre that killed as many as 300 people.

During a 12-hour period between May 31 and June 1, 1921, the Greenwood District of Tulsa, Oklahoma bore witness to the largest incident of racial violence that nation has ever seen. White mobs, some equipped with weapons given to them by local officials, descended on an area of more than 35 square blocks home to a thriving Black community and left it completely destroyed.

Men watching smoke rise from burning building during Tulsa Race Massacre. (Photo: Tulsa Historical Society and Museum)

Over 1,000 Black homes and businesses were burned and looted, and 10,000 people were left homeless as a result of the riot. The destruction inflicted on the community is equal to $20 million in damages today.

Victims were not compensated by the city or by insurance companies, and the lawsuit claims that the massacre created economic disparities that still plague the city today. The suit also alleges that the the city intentionally stifled Greenwood’s efforts to rebuild after the massacre and favored white areas of Tulsa over African-American communities.

“We’re not just talking about what happened in 1921. We’re talking about what’s still happening,” Solomon-Simmons said at a news conference. “We believe this lawsuit will be successful because there is no question there is a nuisance created by the defendants.”

A racial divide still splits Tulsa along economic lines today. Black people in Tulsa are twice as likely to be unemployed as whites are, and the median Black household income is only half that of whites.

A dollar amount has not yet been specified, and the plaintiffs are seeking that the city “abate the public nuisance of racial disparities, economic inequalities, insecurity, and trauma their unlawful actions and omissions caused in 1921 and continue to cause 99 years after the massacre.”

Homes burning during the Tulsa Race Massacre. (Photo: Tulsa Historical Society and Museum)

The suit will also seek a detailed account of property and wealth that was lost or stolen, and the establishment of a hospital in North Tulsa and a Tulsa Massacre Victims Compensation Fund.

The suit will also seek that descendants of those injured, killed, or who lost property in the massacre be granted immunity from all city and county taxes and utility expenses for 99 years.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top