‘Trippin’: Vince Staples Responds to Black Men Being Fetishized by White Woman on Video

Rapper and actor Vince Staples responded to a white woman who went on about how much she adores black men. Others also weighed in on the clip and called it disturbing. Some accused the woman of fetishizing and stereotyping black men.

The TikTok video posted to Twitter on Sunday, April 5. Backlash immediately followed.

Vince Staples responded to a white woman who fetishized black men. (Photo: Scott Dudelson/Getty Images Entertainment via Getty Images)

“For all you chocolate men out there, who said it was okay to be that fine? That athletic? That sexy? So sweet,” the woman asked. “Wonderful personalities. Strong. Tough. Your lips. Your kisses and your hugs just hit different. Not too light, don’t like them too dark. I like them just right.”

The woman then said that her father is okay with her dating black men, and they always give her “butterflies.”

“I can’t wait to find mine,” she added. “People are always like, ‘You look so innocent, you’re so sweet, innocent.’ So I love them.”

Staples responded to the video on the same day it made the internet rounds.

“Porzingis trippin,” he tweeted, calling the woman Kristaps Porzingis, who plays for the Dallas Mavericks.

Others said more and took the woman to task.

“It sounds like she’s looking for a slave,” someone wrote.

“Yo on the real what goes through someone’s head as they sit there on camera saying this, find images to put in the video, rewatch the whole video and then say yea this it and tweet it?” another person asked.

“So where’s the correlation with innocence and liking black men? “a third comment read.

Meanwhile, someone else wrote, “I’m going to bleach my skin so she won’t come for me. I’m good.”

“This was the whole point of the movie ‘Get Out,’ ” another person tweeted.

https://twitter.com/Blackkout__/status/1246882279399579648

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top