Amazon Asked Former Manager to Confirm Gender and Race of Job Applicants Before She Pushed Back and Was Fired, Lawsuit Alleges

Retail giant Amazon is facing a lawsuit by a former manager who claims she was made to scour the social media accounts of prospective hires to identify their race and gender.

When she raised concerns about the questionable practice, she was fired.

Amazon
A former regional manager for Amazon claims she was fired after taking issue with being asked to look up the race and gender of prospective hires on social media. (Photo by Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Lisa McCarrick filed a complaint with California’s superior court Monday, Feb. 24, accusing a unit of the company of retaliation, wrongful termination, failure to prevent discrimination, and violating the state’s labor code, according to NBC News. McCarrick, 38, a former regional manager for Amazon, is also suing for violation of the state’s Equal Pay Act, alleging she was paid far less than her male colleagues.

McCarrick’s initial role, starting in July 2018, was as a loss prevention officer, before she worked her way up to regional manager, the lawsuit states. After her promotion, a supervisor instructed her to poke around job applicants’ social media accounts “for the purpose of ascertaining race/ethnicity and gender.”

She says she was uncomfortable with the ask and, in September 2018, filed a written complaint raising concerns about that as well as the pay disparity between her and her male co-workers. Just two months later, she was called into a meeting with human resources and informed that she was fired.

“During the meeting in which she was informed of her termination, it was communicated to her that her direct supervisor had admitted to utilizing social media accounts for the purpose of ascertaining race and ethnicity,” the complaint states, arguing the “plaintiff’s protected complaints of race/ ethnicity discrimination were substantial motivating reasons for the decision to terminate her employment.”

McCarrick is seeking unspecified damages.

The ex-manager says she was told the reason for her firing was because she wasn’t meeting expectations. All of her previous performance evaluations, according to the lawsuit, were positive.

During the meeting, a loss prevention manager also acknowledged McCarrick was earning less than her male colleagues, but is quoted as saying “‘that happens all the time at Amazon.”

So far, Amazon hasn’t responded to the lawsuit.

Atlanta Black Star reached out for comment and is waiting to hear back.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top