Appeals Court Finds ‘No Constitutional Issue’ With BLM Activist DeRay Mckesson ‘Being Held Liable’ After Cop Injured in 2016 Protest

First out, then in, now a lawsuit an injured Baton Rouge cop waged against a Black Lives Matter organizer is squarely back on the table.

A federal appeals court said Thursday that a lower court judge was wrong to throw out the lawsuit against DeRay Mckesson on First Amendment grounds, according to Louisiana’s largest daily newspaper, The Advocate.

The officer identified only as “John Doe” in court documents is arguing Mckesson was negligent in leading demonstrators to block a public highway and as a result, he was hit in the face by a piece of concrete or a rock-like object.

Man in blue vest
DeRay Mckesson. (Photo: DeRay Mckesson’s Facebook page)

Mckesson was one of almost 200 demonstrators arrested July 10, 2016, as hundreds took to the streets to protest Alton Sterling‘s 2016 shooting death at the hands of a Baton Rouge police officer.

Sterling was gunned down after a cop accosted the unarmed Black man for selling homemade CDs outside a convenience store.

The incident sparked protests across the nation.

In the case against Mckesson, U.S. District Judge Brian Jackson originally dismissed the officer’s lawsuit in 2017, citing Mckesson’s First Amendment rights.

He also noted that Black Lives Matter is not “an entity of any sort,” and like the Civil Rights Movement or Tea Party, can’t be sued, according to CBS affiliate WAFB. 

The lawsuit however, was reinstated in April of 2019 when the court ruled the officer could claim negligence.

Related: Officer Injured in Baton Rouge Protests Can Sue BLM Organizer DeRay Mckesson for Negligence, Federal Court Rules

And even after Mckesson asked the court to review the April decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Thursday that Doe’s complaint shouldn’t have been dismissed on First Amendment grounds.

“We perceive no Constitutional issue with Mckesson being held liable for injuries caused by a combination of his own … conduct and the violent actions of another that were foreseeable as a result of that … conduct,” Judge E. Grady Jolly wrote for the court as it sent the case back to Judge Jackson.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top