‘This Is So Gross’: Laura Ingraham Mercilessly Blasted for Her Ill-Advised Take on Reparations 

Fox News host Laura Ingraham hit a nerve after her racist attack on a recent proposal to grant reparations to Black Americans impacted by the legacy of slavery.

Ingraham made the remarks during a Thursday episode of her podcast, during which she argued there are no “do-overs” after a “conquest,” The Daily Beast reported.

Laura Ingraham

Criticizing the idea of reparations, Fox News host Laura Ingraham declared there are “no do-overs” after a “conquest.” (Photo by Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

The political commentator played a clip of writer Ta-Nehisi Coates blasting Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for his assertion that the election of Barack Obama meant reparations were no longer necessary. Ingraham’s guest, Wilford Reilly, an author and professor at the HBCU Kentucky State, sided with McConnell and argued that reparations would open the door for Native Americans to demand the same.

“I mean, obviously both white and black soldiers, frankly, took this country from the Indians — the first people,” said Reilly.

Ingraham chimed in: “People would argue that the whole world, and I would, the whole world has been reshaped by people taking other people’s land. It’s called conquest.”

“Describing world politics, we won, you lost, that’s that,” she added. “That’s just the way it is … No do-overs, that’s it.”

Her shocking dismissal of the issue spurred a torrent of backlash from critics who were disgusted over her remarks.

“This is so gross I can’t believe it was uttered,” writer Sam Stein tweeted.

“Laura Ingraham is a white nationalist,” wrote another. “Her argument against reparations for African-Americans and indigenous and native peoples: ‘It’s called conquest … we won, you lost, that’s that.'”

“Who is ‘we?’ Who is ‘they?’ What was ‘won’ and ‘lost?’ Also, the rest of you are allowed to call these people racists. Its OK. You can do it now,” tweeted writer Wahajat Ali. 

Another wrote, “To @IngrahamAngle…it’s called America. We built it, you didn’t and that’s that. So we demand reparations for doing your work for you. Perhaps if your ancestors picked their own cotton we wouldn’t be having this discussion.”

One critic argued that it should shock no one at all that Ingraham, 56, has a “frankly disgusting and offensive view of how America doesn’t need to atone for and repair the damage done by slavery.”

The Fox commentator has faced controversy over her past comments, prompting waves of advertisers to pull out of her show. In May, photo service Fracture cut ties with Ingraham’s program after she defended a white supremacist and criticized social media sites for banning him.

Hear more in the clip below.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top