Separated at Birth?: Fans Say Shamari Devoe is Cynthia Bailey’s Doppelganger

Ronnie Devoe‘s wife Shamari Devoe‘s latest photo has fans really mixing her up with Cynthia Bailey. On Sunday, a “Real Housewives of Atlanta” fan page shared photos of Shamari posing for glamour shots in a form-fitting maroon dress. In the caption they quoted Shamari saying, β€œI may be an open book, but that does not mean I am easily read!Β πŸ‘ΈπŸ½ #RHOA”

Shamari Devoe

Some fans seemed to be confused about whether it was actually Cynthia Bailey they were seeing.

“Shamari or Cynthia?!”

“Omg For a second I thought it was Cynthia 😬😬”

“Is it just me or does she favor Cynthia with this look?”

“I thought that was Cynthia for a sec”

“She reminds me of Cynthia”

“I thought it was Cynthia.”

This isn’t the first time fans have confused these two women. In September, a fan account shared a photo of Ronnie and Shamari together. The photo was captioned: “#ShamariDeVoe and hubby #RonnieDeVoe are relationship goals AF! πŸ‘πŸΎπŸ˜πŸ”₯ #RHOA.” One fan jumped in with, “I thought that was Cynthia a quick second,” Another said, “She looks like Cynthia little sister.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual β€” and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top