Swaziland Celebrates 50th Independence with Name Change

African country announces decision to use pre-colonial name.

King Mswati III announced on Wednesday that he’s planning to rename the country of Swaziland.

The ruler of the small African nation since 1986, made the announcement on the 50th anniversary of Swaziland’s independence. The Golden Jubilee celebrations also marked King Mswati’s 50th birthday. The official name change the monarch decided on is “the Kingdom of eSwatini”, which the King has been referring to Swaziland as for years.

The country’s name change means “land of the Swazis”. The King said Swaziland’s name can often be confused with the country Switzerland. “Whenever we go abroad, people refer to us as Switzerland,” the ruler said, according to BBC.

African nations have “reverted to their ancient names before they were colonized,” the King stated to a crowd. “We no longer shall be called Swaziland from today forward,” he said.

Few people of Swaziland have criticized the King’s decision and said he should focus more so on their struggling economy. The price of the name change has yet to be disclosed.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top