Did Shereé Whitfield’s Prison Bae Cause Her to Get Fired From the RHOA?

Sheree

Sheree Whitfield (People.Com)

Although Shereé Whitfield is the queen of comebacks, unfortunately, the Real Housewives of Atlanta star will no longer be returning back on the show next season.

The 48-year-old was reportedly fired from the popular Bravo show on Tuesday according to US Weekly.

Sources told the news outlet the “She by Shereé” fashion designer was terminated from the RHOA after wrapping up Season 10’s reunion and that she was “very upset.” The close source added that her romantic relationship with felon boo Tyrone Gilliams who is currently serving 10 years in prison for taking $5 million in wire fraud schemes, may have played a vital role in her being fired.

“Bravo can’t film inside or even outside the jail. This is causing a problem with her storyline,” the source revealed to US Weekly.

Whitfield’s cast-mate and “frenemy” Porsha Williams, tweeted “Karma” with a peach emoji in response to the 48-year-old’s termination.

RHOA star Kim Zolciak-Biermann, also will not be returning for season 11, B. Scott reported and was first to report the firing of Whitfield.

Shereé appeared on the hit Bravo show for four seasons before leaving in 2012.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top