Charles Blow to Trump Apologist: Tell the President to Keep His Pants On

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLTjk5QZOIk&feature=youtu.be

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation is a “sham investigation” that has created a “witch hunt atmosphere” and is “trying to usurp the power of the presidency,” according to Trump apologist Steve Cortes.

Cortes, a member of President Donald Trump’s Hispanic Advisory Council, suffered a full-on meltdown during a Monday appearance on “CNN Tonight” following reports that FBI officials raided the home and office of Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen. Cortes echoed the president’s anti-FBI rant, expressing shock and dismay at news of the raid.

“This is an outrage!” Cortes exclaimed. “What were we promised by the Mueller probe? We were promised Russia … And what do we end up with here? Sex and a tawdry tale from 12 years ago, far from when Donald Trump ever thought of being in office.”

Host Don Lemon briefly interjected, pointing out that the raid on Cohen’s office was completely separate from the Russia probe.

“That’s disingenuous, Don, let’s be honest,” Cortes said. “Your show and this network for months and months have screamed, ‘Russia, Russia, Russia!’ Guess what? There’s nothing there that connects to President Trump.” He went on to argue that 20 “biased lawyers who hate the president” have poured millions of dollars into investigating Trump’s possible ties to the Russians but still haven’t found anything.

When Lemon noted that many of the folks running the Russia probe are Republicans picked by the president himself, Cortes retorted, “being a Republican hardly means you’re in favor of President Trump.”

“They’re Republicans who can’t stand the president,” he griped. “And by the way, I think the Republicans sadly are as complicit in what is going on now, in terms of these swamp tactics as the Democrats are … This is a sham investigation! This is [Trump’s] own Justice Department trying to usurp the power of the presidency.”

Cortes’ rant was eventually interrupted by political commentator Ana Navarro, who pegged herself as one of those true Republicans who can’t stand Trump because “he’s hijacked the Republican party.” She argued it was appropriate for Cohen to be investigated because one of the things that separates that U.S. from other nations is that no one is above the law — not even the president’s personal attorney.

“I actually marvel at the fact that Donald Trump has gotten as far as he has gotten with his limited intellectual curiosity, vocabulary of about a 4-year-old, and the worst damn lawyer that any of us have ever seen,” Navarro said. “[Cohen] couldn’t even get an NDA executed.”

Fellow panelist Charles Blow then chimed in, speaking about the hoops FBI official would’ve had to jump through for the “witch hunt” claims to be true. He was cut off by Cortes before he could finish his point, however.

“Why are you talking, why does he keep talking?” Blow asked, clearly agitated.

“Tell Trump not to meet up with porn stars while he’s married and drop his trousers and let her spank him with a magazine if he doesn’t want to get caught up in that,” Blow continued. “Keep your pants on!”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top