The Success of a Texas Teen Accepted to 20 Schools Rubs These Fox 5 DC Hosts the Wrong Way and It’s Pathetic 

The success of a Black Texas teen accepted into 20 colleges across the country, including four Ivy Leagues, was enough to aggravate a trio of Fox 5 DC hosts who dubbed the feat “obnoxious.”

Micheal Brown, a student at Mirabeau B. Lamar High School in Houston, snagged full-ride offers from each of the schools to which he applied, including Princeton, Yale and Harvard University, just to name a few. Footage of Brown’s joyous reaction to an acceptance letter from dream school Stanford University has since gone viral.

Not everyone was as ecstatic about his achievements, however.

Brown’s story “has sparked the discussion of how many schools you should apply to,” a Fox 5 anchor noted, suggesting the Texas teen stole the spotlight from other worthy applicants. “Don’t you think it’s a little ridiculous this kid applied to 20 [colleges], basically wait-listing another kid.”

“I think it’s ridiculous,” co-anchor Holly Morris chimed in. “He could’ve applied to five; he would have gotten in to all five and it would be equally impressive. Ten would have been impressive … Admissions officers say on average you should apply to 4-8 schools.”

“I think it’s a little obnoxious,” she added, “because you can only go to one, you can only accept one full ride. And you are taking a spot from someone else who worked really hard.”

A third anchor noted that if a full ride goes unaccepted, it goes back into the pot for other qualified students.

Watch more of the clip above.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top