Florida Woman Swindles Taxpayers Out of Thousands In Food Stamps While Earning Six-Figure Salary

A Florida woman has been charged with third-degree welfare fraud after authorities say she swindled taxpayers out of thousands of bucks in food stamp benefits while she was earning a six-figure salary.

Court documents show Cindy Laraine Clark, 54, of Oxford contacted the Department of Children and Family Services (DFACS) on several occasions between July 2015 and July 2016 to say she was unemployed. In reality, Clark was working for a home health care company where she was paid $133,191 from September 2015 to December 2016, local station News4Jax reported.

An investigation concluded Clark was ineligible to receive the $7,015 in food stamp benefits she collected in 2016. She later admitted to lying about being unemployed and not earning an income on public assistance applications.

Clark was arrested March 10 and booked into the Sumter County Jail. She was released after posting $2,000 bond.

State Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis didn’t hold back in his statement regarding the case.

“Public assistance fraud steals from Floridians who need it most and anyone who tries to game the system will be arrested and held accountable,” Patronis said. “… This criminal knowingly took money that could have otherwise gone to a Florida family in need. It’s disgusting and unacceptable.”

According to News4Jax, Clark’s case comes on the heels of a Jacksonville police investigation into widespread food stamp fraud. The crackdown revealed that nearly 200 people were involved in a scheme to exchange SNAP benefits for cash.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top