Larry King Says the Second Amendment Was Enacted to ‘Ward Off Slave Uprisings’

Television host Larry King added his thoughts to the controversial debate around gun control and noted the 2nd Amendment was originally created to fight off slave rebellions.

King agrees with former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’ opinion of the Second Amendment being repealed.

“I favor changing the Second Amendment …Yeah, repeal it … It’s poorly written. What’d they mean by ‘militia’,” the former CNN host asserted to TMZ on Wednesday.

“You know who started the second amendment? It was southern senators, so they could ward off slave uprisings,” King stated. The host also prodded the National Rifle Association for its gun laws and historical context. “The NRA is the worst,” he said.

The host also told the cameraman to “read his history.”

King’s remarks follow after Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’ op-ed article on Tuesday written in the New York Times. The former law employee urged protesters to suggest a repeal of the Second Amendment. He added that it would be “more effective” and give a “more lasting reform.”

“[Repealing the Second Amendment] would eliminate the only legal rule that protects sellers of firearms in the United States — unlike every other market in the world,” Stevens wrote.

The op-ed piece also noted that the Second Amendment “provided the NRA with a propaganda weapon of immense power.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top