Briton’s Cheddar Man White? Scientist Now Uncertain About DNA Analysis Suggesting First Briton Had ‘Dark to Black Skin’

Cheddar Man

The most recent construction of the Cheddar Man skeleton depicted him with dark skin, curly hair and blue eyes. (Photo by Mark Richards/Daily Mail)

There’s a possibility the U.K.’s “Cheddar Man” may have been white after all, according to one main scientist who helped reconstruct the face of Briton’s oldest near-complete skeleton.

The declaration comes just a month after scientists performed a DNA analysis on the 10,000-year-old skeleton and sensationally revealed he had “dark to black skin,” curly hair and blue eyes. However, Geneticist Susan Walsh of Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis now says there’s simply no way of knowing Cheddar Man’s actual skin color.

While her computer model showed his “probable profile” as being Black, Walsh said DNA testing isn’t enough to say for certain, as the DNA may have degraded over all these years.

“It’s not a simple statement of ‘this person was dark-skinned,’ “ she told New Scientist. “It is his most probable profile, based on current research.”

Utilizing genetic sequencing and facial reconstruction techniques, researchers cross-reference genomes extracted from the ancient skeleton to construct a modern image of his outward appearance. The 10mm of bone powder drilled from his skull was enough to reveal anticipated clues into Cheddar Man’s phenotype and hunter-gatherer lifestyle — or so we thought.

A previous reconstruction of the first Briton, made by the University of Manchester before DNA tests were available, depicted him with fair, white skin, Daily Mail reported. That model had brown eyes, instead of blue, and lighter hair.

The most recent DNA analyzed from the skeleton showed a 76 percent chance he had dark skin, but scientists still say it’s impossible to know for sure.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top