Boxer Anthony Joshua’s Comments On How He Raises His Son Versus His Niece Comes Back to Haunt Him

Anthony Joshua

British boxer Anthony Joshua admitted that he was more strict with his niece because he’s rearing her to be a “good woman.” (Image courtesy of The Independent)

World heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua is under scrutiny this week over comments he made during a 2017 interview where he explained why he’s more “strict” with his niece compared to his son.

Speaking with British GQ, Joshua admitted he isn’t as tough on his son Joseph but is definitely more stringent when it comes to rearing his niece.

“I think it’s because she’s older, but also he’s a boy,” he told the magazine. “He’s going to be a man’s man, he’ll want to spread his wings, be a Jack-the-lad, build his character. But I’m sure there are things I’ll be strict about.”

“But with my niece, there’s none of that Jack-the-lad nonsense for her,” Joshua continued. “My view is, you have to be a good woman, respectful. One day you’ll be someone’s wife – you have to learn family morals [and] what it is to be a “good woman.”

The boxer’s comments drew swift criticism from many on social media, namely actress Kelechi Okafor, who blasted Joshua for denying his niece the right to build her own character.


Others also chimed in on the matter.

https://twitter.com/FionachMiller/status/969676510159364096

https://twitter.com/Fourens_/status/969882200454975488

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top