Mary J. Blige Reveals She Spent More Than She Earned For Oscar-Nominated Role

Mary J Blige

Mary J. Blige’s estranged husband Kendu Isaacs is demanding an increase in spousal support citing the singer’s recent work but Blige says her Oscar-nominated role in the film “Mudbound” cost her money.

The “No More Drama” singer filed court documents for an upcoming divorce trial, arguing that she shouldn’t have to pay Isaacs any additional spousal support according to the “Blast”. The documents state, “The film ‘Mudbound’, for example, has produced no net income for Petitioner, but has garnered her critical acclaim and award nominations. Pursuant to the ‘Mudbound’ contract, the expenses Petitioner was required to pay in connection with filming ‘Mudbound’ were greater than her salary.”

Blige was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress in “Mudbound”. However, the actress said her role in the film was intended to boost her brand & image. Her supporting role actually left her with more financial expenses.

She also claims her main source of income comes from touring and she’s been on the hunt for new projects in order to earn a salary. Blige also owes $25 million in advances for her old music like “Not Gon Cry” and “Just Fine”.

The R&B singer admits paying Isaacs any spousal support would be unjust, considering the couple got into $12 million of debt together and she’s the only one paying it off. Blige relays that her estranged husband is being spiteful and not making any efforts towards getting a job, using her for financial support.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top