Despite Toxicology Report That Says Otherwise, Bobby Brown Isn’t Convinced Drugs Contributed to Whitney Houston’s Death

bobby brown whitney houston

Bobby Brown and Whitney Houston were married for 15 years. (Photo by Chris Walter/WireImage)

Bobby Brown doesn’t think it was drugs that killed his ex-wife Whitney Houston. Instead, he thinks her life ended because she was heartbroken.

“I don’t think she died from drugs,” he says in a February profile six years after Houston was found unresponsive in a Beverly Hilton bathtub on Grammys weekend. “No, not at all. She was really working hard on herself to try to be a sober person and, um … she was a great woman.”

When his wife and manager Alicia Etheredge-Brown interjects and says there were drugs found in Houston’s system, Brown stands firm on his thoughts.

“Well, I don’t think so.”

Adding that he felt there were other things that “played a part,” Brown says his wife of 15 years and mother to the late Bobbi Kristina Brown died from “just being broken-hearted.”

A toxicology report released a month after Houston’s death stated cocaine and traces of marijuana, Xanax, Benadryl and a muscle relaxer were found in her system when she died. The coroner had listed cocaine and heart disease as contributing factors to her death from accidental drowning.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top