Man Who Shot Unarmed Black Man He Deemed ‘Hoodlum’ Guilty of Murder

The white vigilante who shot and killed a 20-year-old Black party-goer has been found guilty of first-degree murder.

Chad Copley was convicted after a two-week trial and jurors deliberated for less than two hours before making the decision, according to the Associated Press. He was found guilty of premeditated murder after fatally firing upon unarmed Kouren-Rodney Thomas in Raleigh, N.C., in 2016.

Thomas had been attending a party near Copley’s home when the incident occurred, where Copley claimed he was part of a neighborhood watch group that didn’t exist.

Prosecutors said the 40-year-old seemed intent on violence when CBS North Carolina reported he told 911 dispatchers, “We got a bunch of hoodlums out here racing. I am locked and loaded and I am going outside to secure my neighborhood. You need to send PD as quickly as possible. I am going to secure my neighborhood. I am on the neighborhood watch. I am going to have my neighbors with me.”

Defense attorneys recognized their client shot the fatal gunshot but claimed he feared for his safety and was protected by the state’s defense of habitation law.

After the verdict, Simone Thomas, the victim’s mother, said tearfully that seeing it unfold was “so hard to go through.”

“Everyday for the past 18 months, not knowing if my son was gonna get justice and he did today,” she told reporters. “And I’m glad about it. And I just hope later on people will always remember that you just can’t take matters into your own hands.”

 

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top