In Light of FBI Probe Into NCAA Violations, Stephen A. Smith Reminds Everyone of Lavar Ball

In wake of the college basketball scandal, an ongoing federal investigation reported by Yahoo Sports, details top players allegedly receiving benefits from NBA agents and college coaches. However, many are wondering how Lavar Ball looks amid corruption probe when he openly spoke about wanting to pay the basketball players.

Ball told ESPN at the time of the announcement last December, “This is giving guys a chance to get a jump start on their career, to be seen by pro scouts, and we’re going to pay them because someone has to pay these kids.”

Stephen A. Smith jumped right to the point and asked ESPN host Jeff Goodman, how Lavar Ball looks in the midst of the NCAA allegations after being called out for having the audacity to create a league that pays athletes.

“When somebody like Lavar Ball is called out by George Raveling, how ridiculous… Do others look right now in light of a controversy like this?”, Smith asked Goodman.

Goodman replied, “Lavar Ball maybe he made the right move here… He’s probably going to end up unscathed and the Ball family name will end up unscathed from all of this because of his decision to say no to all the shoe companies that were throwing a ton of money at him (Lonzo Ball).”

During December of 2017, Lavar Ball decided to withdraw his son Lonzo Ball from the basketball league which may have been one of the best decisions he made.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top