LeBron James Issues Defiant Response to Fox News Host Laura Ingraham 

lebron james

LeBron James has been openly political in recent years. (Photo by Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images for Sports Illustrated)

LeBron James won’t simply “shut up and dribble” like a Fox News anchor told him to.

After Miami Heat guard Dwyane Wade and Philadelphia Eagles defensive end Chris Long came to his defense Friday, Feb. 16, James himself hit back at Laura Ingraham over his criticism of President Donald Trump.

James said on “Rolling with the Champion” Thursday, Feb. 15 that Trump “really don’t give a f— about the people,” which led Ingraham to proclaim that he should “keep the political commentary to yourself or as someone once said, shut up and dribble.”

“It’s always unwise to seek political advice from someone who gets paid $100 million a year to bounce a ball,” she also said on “The Ingraham Angle.”

Wade had remained silent until he posted a photo with lights reading “I am more than an athlete.”

And if there was any doubt that he was referring to Ingraham, his caption ended speculation.

“#WeWillNotShutUpAndDribble,” it said.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BfSIOu_BMHF/?hl=en&taken-by=kingjames

King James also may have indirectly responded to Ingraham on Snapchat, posting a carefree selfie poolside.

“Smiling through it all!” his caption read. “Can’t believe this is my life.”

https://twitter.com/hemjhaveri/status/964546242490568704

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top