LaVar Ball Issues Ultimatum To The Lakers If All Three Sons Aren’t Signed

Outspoken basketball dad LaVar Ball is putting things in motion to have all three of his sons playing for the Los Angeles Lakers. According to Lithuanian basketball journalist Donatas Urbonas, Ball said he won’t let the Lakers re-sign oldest son Lonzo Ball at the end of his rookie season if they don’t agree to take on younger brothers LaMelo and LiAngelo who currently play for a Lithuanian club.

“I want my three boys to play for the Lakers,” Ball says Tuesday, Feb. 12. “But if that does not happen, I’m telling you the story what’s gonna happen first. If they don’t take Gelo this year, I’ll bring Gelo here to play with Melo for two years. Lonzo will be on his third year and I want to let every NBA team know that Lonzo is not going to re-sign with the Lakers but will go to any team that will take all of my three boys. So that’s my plan.

“If you don’t take Gelo this year — you don’t have to take Gelo if you don’t want to. But Lonzo plays best chemistry when he is with his brother. Why wouldn’t you? He is a hell of a shooter. They don’t play the same position. You see how successful he was when he was with his brother?”

Ball added that LiAngelo could sign as a free agent and get paid $1 million over the course of three years.

“What’s better than the three Ball boys together? The big three — the original three?” LaVar Ball asks.

But Sports Illustrated reported that LiAngelo, who withdrew from UCLA following a suspension for shoplifting overseas, is not presently considered an NBA caliber prospect.

Still, this isn’t the first time Ball has spoken about his hopes to have all three sons play for the Lakers.

At a January Lithuanian press conference, he signed a local reporter’s Lakers cap with the date that all three boys would be playing for the team: 2020.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top