Old Navy Fires 3 Employees After Viral Post Alleges Racial Profiling

After a video went viral of a Black man claiming he was racially profiled at an Old Navy store in Iowa, three employees have since been fired.

James Conley said he was a victim of racial discrimination when a store employee asked if was going to pay for the coat he had on and accused him of stealing the item that he received as a Christmas gift.

“I was accused that I didn’t pay for the blue bubble jacket that I got for Christmas that I wore into the store,” Conley stated in his Facebook post.

Conley demanded that the employees check the surveillance footage which proved the jacket belonged to him. He said neither the store supervisor nor any of the employee apologized.

Old Navy issued a statement regarding the termination of the employees involved.

The victim told “KCCI Des Moines 8” he plans on filing a civil rights complaint and a civil damages lawsuit against Old Navy.

“It’s just a blessing to see this nationwide and hearing my story out, to see them in the wrong and accusing me of something that I have never done in my life,” Conley expressed.

The president of the Iowa-Nebraska NAACP Betty Andrews has also spoken out. “Racial profiling is humiliating… It is hurtful and it is outrageous,” she stated.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top