Here’s Why Members of CBC Wore Kente Cloth and Didn’t Applaud Trump During SOTU

 

During President Trump’s first “State Of The Union Address” to Congress on Tuesday (Jan. 30) evening in Washington D.C., he mentioned low black unemployment at a record low and members of the Congressional Black Caucus were unimpressed. Senator Kamala Harris set the record straight as to why the Congressional members chose not to applaud.

The Caucus leaders wore traditional African kente cloth and black clothing to protest Trump’ “shithole comments” about Africa and Haiti. It should come to no surprise that the camera showed the Black Caucus not applauding as Trump boasted about the new unemployment rate records.

“Can you help explain that to viewers who might not understand why so few people were applauding that notion, that black unemployment is down so much”, Jack Tapper CNN Correspondent asked Senator Harris.

“Probably because we all know that the way he should have made that statement is that at the end of that statement he should have said, ‘Thank you, President Obama.'”

Harris continued, “The priorities of the previous administration that we saw a five-point drop in unemployment among the black population of the United States, and that trend has continued — but frankly, actually, last year by only one percent.”

Democrats along with others feel Trump is taking credit for the improved economy of the U.S. and they aren’t too fond of it. This is also the first time Trump has addressed the Black Caucus since the offensive remarks he made.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top