H&M Slammed as Racist for Ad Featuring Black Boy In ‘Coolest Monkey’ Hoodie

H&M

H&M has pulled the offending hoodie from its website. (Marco Verch)

Swedish fashion brand H&M has apologized after outrage poured out surrounding an ad many deemed racist. The retail company was selling a children’s hoodie modeled by a Black boy which read, “Coolest Monkey In the Jungle.”

“This image has now been removed from all H&M channels and we apologize to anyone this may have offended,” H&M spokeswoman Anna Eriksson told CNN Money Monday, Jan. 8.

The controversy erupted Sunday night when Twitter users sounded off on the apparel, which was sold on the retailer’s UK and US websites.

https://twitter.com/Mamasita_96/status/950228212411457536

Several had called for a boycott of the company.

Yet others didn’t see an issue.


Other Racist Fashion Pieces Like H&M

European Fashion Company Tries to Pass Off Racist Black Face Symbol as Penguin Inspired, Sparks Outrage

Are Bans on Leggings Sexist and Racist? One Maryland Mother Thinks So

Gap Apologizes for Arguably Racist Ad Where Black Girl Is Used as Armrest


https://twitter.com/ALLIESOPHIALOV1/status/950265360409944065

And some weren’t backing up the boycott, either.

https://twitter.com/IzayaDaGod/status/950364910256566273

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top