Tiger Woods Threatens to Sue Over Leaked Nude Photos

Tiger Woods would likely rather win another Masters than be part of this nude photos list. (John Lamparski/ WireImage/Getty
Images)

Tiger Woods has unwillingly joined a club no celeb wants to be a part of — Hacked Celeb Nudes — and he’s not taking it lightly.

 

The champion golfer’s lawyer, Michael Holtz, has threatened to hit the website Celeb Jihad with a lawsuit if the photos aren’t removed immediately, according to a Monday, Aug. 21, report from TMZ. Sources said a hacker got into Alpine ski racer Lindsey Vonn’s phone, whom Woods dated for three years before they split in 2015.


Poor Tiger: Glimpse Golfer’s Latest Woes

  1. Tiger Woods Addresses Reports of 5 Drugs In His System On Night of DUI
  2. Tiger Woods Pleads ‘Not Guilty’ by Not Attending Arraignment On DUI Charge
  3. Tiger Woods Seen Confused, Stumbling On Police Dashcam Video

The photos were taken while the pair was together and Vonn, also a victim of the leak, said in a statement to People magazine that she plans to take legal action over the “despicable invasion of privacy.”

As of Tuesday morning, photos of the former couple were still on the site.

Miley Cyrus, Kristin Stewart and “American Idol” singer Katherine McPhee are other celebrities who have been targeted by the website.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top