Review Board Hears More Testimony In the 2016 N.C. Police Killing of Black Man

Attorneys Charles Monette (left) and Justin Bamberg chat prior to a citizens review board hearing in Charlotte, N.C.(AP Photo/Skip Foreman)

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A citizens review board is hearing more testimony on a North Carolina police force’s decision that the shooting of Black man by a police officer was justified.

The board listened to about eight hours of testimony behind closed doors Tuesday in the September 2016 shooting death of Keith Lamont Scott. More testimony is scheduled for Wednesday.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police said the shooting by Officer Brentley Vinson was justified and Mecklenburg County District Attorney Andrew Murray said no charges would be filed.

But the review board announced in June that it found a potential error in the department’s decision. It didn’t say publicly what the error might have been, but its initial finding resulted in the second hearing in the case.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top