Jordan Peele’s Directorial Debut, ‘Get Out,’ So Far Is 2017’s Most Profitable Film

Daniel Kaluuya’s portrayal of Chris in “the sunken place” is now referenced throughout social media.
(Blumhouse)

After opening at the top spot in February, Jordan Peele’s racial thriller “Get Out” is the most profitable movie of 2017 so far.

The movie starring Daniel Kaluuya and Allison Williams earned $33.4 million opening weekend and The Wrap reported it has earned a 630-percent return on investment.

With a $4.5 million budget and an estimated $30 million in marketing costs, “Get Out” had a stellar ROI on its $252-million global gross. Such factors were used in tabulating the 25 best-performing movies of the year. As a result, second-place “Split,” which was developed by the same production company as “Get Out,” had a 610-percent ROI. Meanwhile, the top grossing movie of 2017, “Beauty and the Beast,” is a distant third with an ROI of more than 400 percent.

“Get Out,” a satirical horror film, which follows Chris, a Black man, as he meets his white girlfriend’s family for the first time, can credit its success in part to social media buzz and word-of-mouth testimonials. The film is still a huge hit online, with key scenes being the basis for GIFs galore.

via GIPHY

via GIPHY

via GIPHY

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top