Sen. Kamala Harris Shut Down by Committee Chairman While Grilling a Justice Department Official

In the middle of grilling a Justice Department official in a high-profile, televised Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on June 7, Sen. Kamala Harris was cut off and admonished by the committee’s chairman for not allowing the official to answer.

The hearing involved leaders of the FBI, National Security Agency and Justice Department, and the director of National Intelligence being questioned about whether President Donald Trump has attempted to intervene in ongoing investigations into Russian election interference.

During the proceedings, Harris, a California Democrat, repeatedly asked Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein whether he would sign a letter to give Special Counsel Robert Mueller full independence from the Justice Department.

“Yes or no, sir,” Harris again asked. “Are you willing to do …”

“Will the senator suspend?” interjected Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, the committee’s chair.

“The chair,” he added, “is going to exercise its right to allow the witnesses to answer the question, and the committee is on notice to provide the witnesses the courtesy, which has not been extended all the way across, extend the courtesy for questions to get answered.”

That prompted a look of disbelief on her face and reportedly brought a hush over the packed room.

“Mr. Chairman, respectfully, I would point out that this witness has joked, as we all have, his ability to filibuster,” said Harris, before Burr stopped her again.

A number of people covering the hearing pointed out that other senators had interrupted those testifying, but that Harris, one of just three women on the committee and the former California attorney general, was the only senator admonished.

“Only one, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), was cut off by the committee’s chair,” said Alice Ollstein of Talking Points Memo.

“Another day, another time a woman is chastised for doing the exact same thing her male colleagues got away with without criticism, ” wrote Andrea Gonzalez-Ramirez of Rifinery 29.

Following the hearing, Harris wrote in Twitter message that she refused to be deterred from getting the truth.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top