Rosa Parks’ Niece Dismisses Ridiculous Comparison Between Aunt and United Passenger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mIO-yC9h4Q

Rosa Parks’ niece says there’s no way the United Airlines passenger being dragged off a plane has any similarities to her aunt’s planned action of not giving up her seat in Alabama during the height of segregation.

David Dao is a Vietnamese doctor who was yanked off a United Airlines flight Sunday, April 9 when he refused crew orders to abandon his seat. His lawyer said he received an email Thursday from someone who proclaimed Dao is the “modern-day Asian Rosa Parks.”

Parks was a longtime member of the Montgomery, Ala., NAACP when she refused to give her seat to a white passenger on a bus in 1955.

“Is Dr. Dao the modern-day Rosa Parks? I would say no,” Parks’ niece Urana McCauley tells TMZ Friday, April 14. “Unfortunately, what happened to Dr. Dao is definitely wrong and it was definitely a mistreatment of him. But, as someone who is her niece and grew up with Rosa Parks and knowing her on a personal level, knowing all that she endured and knowing what Black people in this country have endured at that time, I feel that you cannot compare the two.”

McCuley noted Dao will likely change United’s policy for removing passengers, but Parks “changed history.”

“There is no comparison,” she says. “On a personal level … these things weren’t in a textbook, the death threats my aunt was getting all the way up until 2000. You can’t say that what happened to [Dao] is what happened to people like my aunt, who helped change history forever.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top