South Africa Considering Constitutional Amendment to Restore Land to Rightful Owners

President Jacob Zuma File picture: Nic Bothma/EPA

Parliament – Land restitution without compensation was crucial for reconciliation in South Africa, President Jacob Zuma said on Thursday.

“How do we have peace and stability if land [issue] is not resolved?” Zuma asked, while responding to a debate in a sitting of the National House of Traditional Leaders in Parliament. Zuma agreed with many of the traditional leaders who said a Constitutional amendment was necessary to allow expropriation without compensation.

“We are not saying let us now go and take the land. We are saying let us amend the Constitution,” he said.

However, Inkatha Freedom Party leader Mangosuthu Buthelezi was unconvinced. “I fear if we deviate from the Constitution, we risk reconciliation and even investment in South Africa,” Buthelezi said.

He warned that South Africa could go the way of Zimbabwe, with land grabs, division and a lack of social justice. Zuma rejected this and said there would be no land grabs.

“No one is saying let us go and grab, no,” Zuma said. “We are saying let us do everything within the law.”

One of the traditional leaders, Prince Zolile Burns-Ncamashe, said the expropriation of land without compensation should be prioritized as it was “in the public interest.”

“If there is doubt, we appeal to you, Mr. President, that you call a national referendum so as to test the public opinion on expropriation without compensation,” Burns-Ncamashe said.

“The indigenous people were brutally dispossessed of their land by the Dutch and the British imperialists without reparation …”

Read more here

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top