Chris Hayes Gets More Than He Bargained for After Young Man Brilliantly Explains Violence In Chicago

Chicagoan Ja’Mal Green courageously took Mayor Rahm Emanuel to task for allegedly redirecting financial resources to wealthy parts of the city and neglecting the poorer, Blacker areas that need resources the most.

Th outspoken audience member told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes during a Friday, Feb. 10, town hall titled “Chicago In the Crosshairs” that Emanuel “did not care about Black people.” Green criticized city officials for relying heavily on police to react to the situation of violence instead of investing resources that could prevent the current epidemic of violence and bloodshed.

Green said people are not discussing the root causes that create the conditions in Chicago. “When you talk about violence,” he explains, “you have to talk about the economics, not the police.”

In under a minute, Green broke down how the wealthiest Chicagoans continue to get richer as the poor continue to suffer because of the unequal distribution of funds that could be to blame for the Windy City’s issues. “When you can invest $100 million into DePaul basketball arena. When they can practice in the United Center for free and $16.4 million in uptown to build upscale apartments, when you can build these new bus stops downtown and walk in our neighborhoods and not a million is coming,” Green says.

“We’re walking past boarded-up schools, boarded-up houses they knocking down with red axes with no plan to redevelop … The unemployment rate in Chicago is the highest that it is around the country.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top