MLK’s Niece Says Democrats Shamefully Used Coretta Scott King’s Letter to Divide Americans

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece Alveda King claims Democrats’ attempt to derail Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ confirmation was another effort by Democrats to play the “race card” to divide Americans.

The frequent Fox News contributor shared her insight on the recent failed political maneuver where Democrats tried to convince senators not to confirm Sessions by reading a 1986 letter from Coretta Scott King condemning him for his lack of commitment to Black rights.

During her, Wednesday, Feb. 8, appearance on Fox Business, King said that Democrats used her aunt for political brownie points and to rile up the American people.

“It’s almost like a bait and switch,” King explains. “Stir up their emotions, use the name of King — and my name is Alveda King — stir up people’s emotions, play the race card, which she was attempting to do.”

While she admitted that her aunt’s statements were based on fact when the letter was initially written, King said her aunt would have had a change of heart if she were alive today.

“In that letter, she would be referring to some of his comments,” King says. “However, she would agree today that he, of course, ended some school segregation and he worked to prosecute members of the KKK.”

King, unprovoked, veered off into a discussion about immigration and jobs, claiming that her aunt spoke out against immigration because it would hurt Black people. “She wrote a letter saying immigration could hurt the Black job market,” King says.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top