Coca-Cola Sued by Nonprofit for Paying Experts to Deceive Public About Soda’s Link to Obesity

Coca-Cola 2 liter bottles (Mike Mozart/Flickr)

Coca-Cola and its trade group American Beverage Association are being sued by a nonprofit over allegations they have tricked the public into thinking the sugary soda doesn’t negatively impact health, only lack of exercise does.

The Praxis Project, a group that looks to create healthier communities, filed the lawsuit in a California federal court, Wednesday, Jan. 4. According to the documents obtained by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, plaintiff Praxis alleges that defendants Coca-Cola and the ABA pointed to a lack of exercise rather than drinking sugary beverages as the cause of increasing obesity rates in the nation. It continued by stating the defendants misrepresented reports that have confirmed sodas are linked to issues like Type-2 diabetes, heart disease and obesity.

Other accusations in the suit say Coca-Cola and the ABA paid experts and nutritionists to downplay the risks of consuming the beverage. The documents stated Coke ran op-eds, columns and blogs supporting the notion, with one article by Professor Baylen Linnekin declaring “key data shows the lack of a causal link between soda consumption and obesity.”

On the advertising end, Praxis’ filing accuses Coke of tricking buyers by using phrases like “balance” and “calories-in, calories out” to promote exercise as a culprit for poor health. And in a comparison to the tobacco industry, the nonprofit said the defendants market their products to youth by using celebrities and cartoon characters “despite a pledge not to do so.”

Both the ABA and Coca-Cola have recognized the lawsuit and the latter issued a statement to Quartz, noting Praxis’ claim is “legally and factually meritless.”

“We take our consumers and their health very seriously and have been on a journey to become a more credible and helpful partner in helping consumers manage their sugar consumption,” the statement read. “To that end, we have led the industry adopting clear, front-of-pack calorie labeling for all our beverages. We are innovating to expand low- and no-calorie products; offering and promoting more drinks in smaller sizes; reformulating products to reduce added sugars; transparently disclosing our funding of health and well-being scientific research and partnerships; and do not advertise to children under 12.”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top