Coca-Cola Sued by Nonprofit for Paying Experts to Deceive Public About Soda’s Link to Obesity

Coca-Cola 2 liter bottles (Mike Mozart/Flickr)

Coca-Cola and its trade group American Beverage Association are being sued by a nonprofit over allegations they have tricked the public into thinking the sugary soda doesn’t negatively impact health, only lack of exercise does.

The Praxis Project, a group that looks to create healthier communities, filed the lawsuit in a California federal court, Wednesday, Jan. 4. According to the documents obtained by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, plaintiff Praxis alleges that defendants Coca-Cola and the ABA pointed to a lack of exercise rather than drinking sugary beverages as the cause of increasing obesity rates in the nation. It continued by stating the defendants misrepresented reports that have confirmed sodas are linked to issues like Type-2 diabetes, heart disease and obesity.

Other accusations in the suit say Coca-Cola and the ABA paid experts and nutritionists to downplay the risks of consuming the beverage. The documents stated Coke ran op-eds, columns and blogs supporting the notion, with one article by Professor Baylen Linnekin declaring “key data shows the lack of a causal link between soda consumption and obesity.”

On the advertising end, Praxis’ filing accuses Coke of tricking buyers by using phrases like “balance” and “calories-in, calories out” to promote exercise as a culprit for poor health. And in a comparison to the tobacco industry, the nonprofit said the defendants market their products to youth by using celebrities and cartoon characters “despite a pledge not to do so.”

Both the ABA and Coca-Cola have recognized the lawsuit and the latter issued a statement to Quartz, noting Praxis’ claim is “legally and factually meritless.”

“We take our consumers and their health very seriously and have been on a journey to become a more credible and helpful partner in helping consumers manage their sugar consumption,” the statement read. “To that end, we have led the industry adopting clear, front-of-pack calorie labeling for all our beverages. We are innovating to expand low- and no-calorie products; offering and promoting more drinks in smaller sizes; reformulating products to reduce added sugars; transparently disclosing our funding of health and well-being scientific research and partnerships; and do not advertise to children under 12.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top