Losing Weight Can Be Challenging, a Food Journal Can Help

Losing weight can be challenging for so many in our super-sized culture and despite the well-intentioned, but misguided laws  to regulate portions, real regulation is an individual responsibility.

If you’ve tried almost everything  to lose weight and can’t seem to shed the pounds, then here is one more thing to give a try.

If you really want to lose weight, you should seriously think about keeping a food journal.

That’s the key message of a study published online Monday in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (which used to be the Journal of the American Dietetic Association).

The study, conducted by researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, involved 123 overweight-to-obese, sedentary women ages 50 to 75.

Half the women followed both a diet and an exercise program, while the other half just followed a diet. Women in both groups lost an average of 10 percent of their original body weight. (This study, part of a larger one, did not directly evaluate the effect of exercise on weight loss.)

Those who kept food journals did a bit better than the rest, losing about 6 more pounds than the journal-free women.

The researchers note that the more detailed and consistent the food journaling, the better results you’re likely see. That means measuring food portions, recording every bit of food you put in your mouth, carrying your journal (or app) everywhere you go, and being mindful of preparation methods and nutrition-facts labels.

Other results:

●Women who ate many meals in restaurants lost less weight than those who ate fewer meals out; the relationship was strongest for lunch, with those who went out for lunch at least weekly losing an average of 5 pounds fewer than women who didn’t eat lunch out as often.

●Women who skipped meals lost, on average, 8 fewer pounds than those who didn’t.

Read the rest of this story on the Washington Post

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top