Jamar Clark’s Father Speaks Out After Learning Officers Involved in His Son’s Death Escaped Charges

On Oct. 21, Minneapolis Police Chief Janeé Harteau told the media that officers involved in the fatal police shooting of 24-year-old Jamar Clark would not be charged for misconduct.

Clark died after police shot him during a domestic dispute call in November 2015, per Atlanta Black Star. According to initial reports, eyewitnesses believed Clark was unarmed, shot while handcuffed and did not warrant the excessive use of force inflicted on him.

Last Friday, Harteau said officers Mark Ringgenberg and Dustin Schwarze did not violate department procedures. In an exclusive with ABC 5 Eyewitness News, Clark’s adoptive father said he and his wife had no idea there was an internal investigation going on. James Clark believes the police chief is lying about the details of his son’s death.

“They’re lying,” he tells reporters. “It wasn’t no need for them to tackle him to the ground. He didn’t have no weapon … So why was it necessary for them to pull out a gun and shoot him?”

James Clark said he cannot understand why the officers involved were not charged. He rebuts Harteau’s announcement and says race was the determining factor in the case.

“They don’t even believe them Black people [eyewitnesses near the scene of the shooting] … Because they was all Black. But if that had been four or five white people there that said the same thing — what the Black people said — it would be a different story.”

The family plans to file a civil suit because they believe it is their only avenue for justice.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top