Shannon Sharpe Reminds Ruth Ginsburg That Her Bias Against Kaepernick Carries Real Consequences

On the Oct. 11 edition of FOX Sports One’s Undisputed, commentator Shannon Sharpe spoke on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg  recent statements denouncing San Francisco 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick’s national anthem protest.

Ginsburg told Yahoo News’ Katie Couric that the QB’s wide sweeping protest is as disrespectful as flag burning. “I think it’s dumb and disrespectful,” she said. “I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it.”

However, Sharpe took offense to her statements, because Ginsburg fails to understand how much power her words carry. The commentator professes his respect for the Justice’s career championing liberal causes. But he had to let her know that she is wrong.

“… She has a different view of what that flag represents,” he starts. “… [Ginsburg] realizes what her opinions mean … She doesn’t care why [Kaepernick] is doing it … Let’s say that something of this magnitude comes to her court. And she has already offered a strong opinion, she might have to recuse herself.”

Later on in the clip, Sharpe adds that white people in America cannot understand the issues Black people face without acknowledging their own privilege. He says that Ginsburg and others like her need to understand that America is different for African-Americans. And that Kaepernick’s reason for protesting is more important than the actual protest.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top