Stephen A. Smith Gives Cam Newton a Much Needed History Lesson on Racism in America

On the Sept. 1 edition of ESPN’s “First Take,” sports journalist Stephen A. Smith criticizes Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton for his interview about San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick‘s protest of the national anthem.

In an interview with ESPN’s Trey Wingo, Newton says that he does not support or disagree with Kaepernick’s protest. His no-response comes two weeks after claiming that racism is no longer an issue in the country.

On today’s show, Smith starts off the segment giving Newton a rundown of the injustices Black people have had to face.

The commentator mentions the poll taxes, IQ tests and voting laws that prevented Black men from voting after being granted the right.

“He knows what racism is,” Smith declares. ” … You gon’ dance around it like you have nothing to say.”

Smith adds that many athletes expect journalists like himself to speak out against racism.

However, those athletes would not do it themselves.

“Here’s what it comes down to for me,” he says. “What I saw was a superstar athlete who is the reigning league MVP who stars in the NFL right now for the Carolina Panthers, thinking about his brand. And is that new to us? We’ve got guys that are millionaires, 10, 20, 50, 100 times over, scared to take a position.”

Near the end of the clip, Smith states that Michael Jordan has been criticized for not saying anything.

But Jordan has hired Black people and donated large sums of his earnings to Black communities.

Smith believes Newton should not get a pass.

“… What [are] you scared of?”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top