Watch: Not Even Marc Lamont Hill Can Keep His Composure in the Face of an Ex-NYPD Detective Spewing Racial Ignorance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y_3G1b2Kc0

On today’s edition of CNN’s New Day, professor Marc Lamont Hill and former New York City Police Department detective Harry Houck almost come to blows when Houck states that Black people are prone to criminality.

In the nearly 10-minute video, the former NYPD detective believes that Black people commit the most crime and that cops are the real victims because they are “second-guessed” more than ever.

“That’s why there are more Blacks in jail than there are whites,” Houck states. “They turn it around — the racial demagogues out there — turn it around that the Blacks are being picked on.”

Hill replies that cops should be evaluated by the public because they are public servants just the way “we should second-guess our politicians.”

Houck interrupts and continues to say that Black people are prone to criminality.

“You think Black people are prone to criminality?” Hill asks. “You don’t mean to say that. I’m going to give you a chance to correct [yourself]. You don’t mean that Black people are prone to criminality.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top