UN Votes to Give Ethiopia a Temporary Seat on Security Council

The UN Security Council (Photo via DW.com)

The UN Security Council (Photo via DW.com)

Ethiopia has won a seat on the United Nations Security Council following an overwhelming vote of 185 out of the 193-member General Assembly of the body.

Along with Ethiopia, Sweden, Kazakhstan and Bolivia were also elected after Tuesday’s vote. The four countries would be joined by one other to serve on the Council for the year 2017-2018.

The seat yet to be decided would pit the Netherlands against Italy to see who joins Ethiopia and the three others.

The Swedish Ambassador to Libya and Tunisia, Fredrik Florén, took to Twitter to thank the two north African countries for supporting them (Sweden) to get onto the Council.

Africa’s current representatives on the Council, Egypt and Senegal, would be stepping down at the end of 2017 when their two-year term comes to an end.

The UN Security Council has five permanent members – US, UK, Russia, China and France — and 10 non-permanent members.

Ethiopia was elected to the Council with 185 votes out of 190 votes cast. One vote was invalid while two other members abstained.

Ethiopia replaces Angola on the Council at the end of the year. The African Union endorsed the country’s candidacy during the heads of state member meeting earlier this year.

Read more here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top