Kenya to Begin Closing Africa’s Largest Refugee Camp

Dadaab, The Refugee City (Photo via The Guardian)

Dadaab, The Refugee City (Photo via The Guardian)

Kenya will begin closing Africa’s largest refugee camp on July 1, an Interior Ministry official said, shrugging off international criticism of the move that will affect its mainly Somali population.

The “operation” at Dadaab, in the East African nation’s northeast, will “go on over several months,” Amos Gathecha, the ministry’s security and operations secretary, said Thursday at a meeting of stakeholders in Kenya’s tourism industry in the port city of Mombasa.

“We are aware of the international outcry regarding the closure,” he said. “We are not going back on closing Daadab.” Authorities will monitor “how it will work as far as securing our country goes.”

Kenya, which hosts as many as 600,000 refugees mainly from neighboring Somalia, said it is closing its two biggest refugee camps, citing costs to its economy and security. The Dadaab complex in northern Kenya was set up to deal with an influx of people fleeing conflict in Somalia following the ouster of dictator Mohamed Siad Barre in 1991. It hosts about 333,000 people, according to the United Nations.

Read more here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top