Watch: Accused South African Murderer Removes Prosthetic Legs to Show ‘Vulnerability’ and Gain Jury’s Sympathy

Paralympian runner Oscar Pistorius removed his artificial legs in a Pretoria, South Africa courtroom today as he faced sentencing for the 2013 murder of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp.

Defense attorney Barry Roux asked Pistorius to put on this demonstration to show the accused Olympian’s “vulnerability” to the jury the day he fatally shot his girlfriend on February 14, 2013.

On that February morning, Pistorius — who was not wearing his prosthetic legs at the time — shot his girlfriend because he believed she was an intruder.

The defense wants a lesser sentence than the 15-year minimum for murder in South Africa. Attorneys cite a variety of mental, emotional and physical issues, according to a report from CNN.

“He suffers from an anxiety disorder. We know that uncontested evidence that when he was on his stumps, his balance was seriously compromised, and without anything he won’t be able to defend himself,” Roux said.

The attorney went on to say, “He was anxious, he was frightened. … He was suffering from anxiety disorder, and that’s not gone. This must all be seen in context of his disability.”

Pistorius will be sentenced on July 6.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top