Airbnb, in Heat of Class-Action Suit, Accused of Violating Fair Housing Act

Vacation Rental Site Airbnb

Vacation Rental Site Airbnb

One of the largest vacation rental sites, Airbnb, is under major scrutiny and being hit with a class-action suit for discrimination against its African-American users. The class-action suit that was held in Washington D.C. federal court on Tuesday was due to the allegations that Airbnb violated the Fair Housing Act.

According to NBC Bay Area, in March 2015 25-year-old Gregory Seldon, an African-American male, used the site as an alternative to affordable lodging for the planning of his weekend vacation. Seldon claims he was denied because of his race.

Seldon alleges that while searching for housing on Airbnb, he used his Facebook login, which displayed his information; race, picture, age, and education. Seldon argues that he was denied due to the visibility of his profile. Following his denial, “Seldon re-applied using profiles imitating white men, one under the name “Jessie” and another under the name “Todd,” says NBC Bay Area. His applications as “Jessie” and “Todd” were approved, giving practical grounds for his discrimination suit.

At the earlier part of this year, many took to twitter with the hash tag #Airbnbwhileblack to give accounts of their dealings with the site and how they too were discriminated.

“This is hardly the first time Airbnb has been accused of not doing enough to combat discrimination on its platform,” states NBC Bay Area.

Airbnb denied all allegations. They claim that Airbnb disapproves any act of racism on their site and although acts of racism were alleged, their anti-discrimination policy discloses otherwise: “content that promotes discrimination, bigotry, racism, hatred, harassment or harm against any individual or group, and we require all users to comply with local laws and regulations.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top