Kerry Washington Vents About Photoshopped Adweek Cover: ‘I Was Taken Aback’

kerrywashington_elleAfter a recent shoot with “Adweek” for its April 4 issue, actress Kerry Washington is taken aback by the beautiful stranger on the magazine’s front cover.

Washington, 39, shares in an Instagram post to her fans that she’s not a stranger to Photoshop, but the face illustrated on the magazine’s cover is not hers. In fact, she says it is unrecognizable. In today’s world, where filters and crops are common when posting everyday pictures, Washington acknowledges to fans in her IG posts that society has become “picture adjusters” and has in some ways lost its authenticity.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BD1Yu–ABne/

Over the years, stars have begun speaking out about excessive airbrushing and false portrayals of themselves. Actress Lena Dunham  confronted a Spanish newspaper last week for giving her photo a “more than average” Photoshop treatment, according to a CNN article. Also, actress/singer Zendaya had a dispute with Modeliste magazine after they drastically Photoshopped her body in a recent spread. “These are the things that make women self conscious, that create the unrealistic ideals of beauty that we have. Anyone who knows who I am knows I stand for honest and pure self love,” Zendaya said in an IG post after the incident.  

According to US Weekly, this isn’t the first time Washington has called out a magazine for over-Photoshopping her. She previously noted when both InStyle (March 2015) and Lucky (December 2013/January 2014) lightened her skin tone for their cover shots.

Adweek‘s editorial director, Jim Cooper, tweeted that there was indeed a tweak to the image, albeit a very small one.

“Happy @kerrywashington was proud of her Adweek profile, sad cover misses for her,” he tweeted. “Added volume to hair for dramatic effect. No disrespect.”

Though Washington is unfamiliar with the woman on the cover, she added in her IG post that she’s proud of the article and thanked those who have been “kind and supportive” about the feature.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top