Facebook CEO Responds to Growing Anti-Black Lives Matter Sentiments Among Employees

Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook’s employees have been accused of having anti-Black Lives Matter sentiments after acts of vandalism at the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, California.

Based on the number of pro-BLM signatures on the company’s famous signature wall that has been crossed out and replaced with “all lives matter,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg had to respond.

Zuckerberg’s full statement is below:

fb-memo

Zuckerberg’s statement tries to educate those who do not seem to get why the BLM movement exists.

We all are very aware that “all lives matter” but it is the numerous cases where Black people’s civil liberties are violated that is the focus of the movement.

The movement was birthed after the death of Ferguson, Missouri teenager Michael Brown by former cop Darren Wilson. The lack of cop convictions spawned BLM into a national movement focused on abolishing police brutality and other forms of institutional racism within the justice system.

Mark Zuckerberg gets this.

The images of violent police shootings are constantly plastered all over social media and television. These images are replayed as if the victims’ lives don’t matter.

Facebook has been notorious for allowing users to post racist messages without consequence, while pro-Black pages and profiles are constantly reported and reprimanded.

These multiple incidents prove that the company’s issues with race starts at home.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top