Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Politics/National
CultureMusicNationalNews

RZA Tries to Clarify Comments About Respectability Politics and Police Brutality

Posted byBy Ricky Riley | Published on: CommentsComments (1)

1453295_743870535748045_683132297129302495_nLast week, rapper and composer RZA voiced his opinions on politics, race and police brutality in a Bloomberg interview.

However, there was a social media backlash for this particular statement:

“When you think about some of the brothers who are being brutalized by the police, you also got to have them take a look, and us take a look, in the mirror at the image we portray. If I’m a cop, and every time I see a young Black youth, whether I watch them on TV, movies, or just see them hanging out, and they’re not looking properly dressed, properly refined, you know, carrying himself, conducting himself proper hours of the day—things that a man does, you’re going to have a certain fear and stereotype of them.”

His words were hurtful to some because the way Black people dressed has never stopped police brutality. Suits and fedoras did not stop police dogs from attacking peaceful Black protesters during the Civil Rights Era. Fancy shirts and slacks did not stop lynchings in the 1920s and ’30s. Historically, respectability politics is a failure and a false sense of hope. Twitter users pointed that out:

RZA tries to elaborate on his points but his following tweets fell short:

Mar07LN-blog480

tumblr_muced4zrJl1s7e5k5o1_500

untitled

It appears RZA has forgotten about the many great Civil Rights activists who were attacked while dressed in their Sunday best.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top