White Privilege: 10 Times White People Engaged The Police With Guns or Violence and Lived To Talk About It

oath keepers

Oathkeepers in Ferguson, Missouri

As Black Lives Matter protesters and activists clashed and yet another state of emergency was declared, members of a radical anti-government group called “Oathkeepers” descended into Ferguson, dressed in body armor and openly carrying assault rifles. The heavily armed white men were left unmolested by the police as they roamed freely about the streets. This is in stark contrast to the peaceful Black protesters who had been met with military-grade equipment and pepper spray, and over 120 arrests.

 

AP_waco_texas_shooting_1_jt_150517_16x9_992Waco Shooting

On May 17, two rival motorcycle gangs — the Cossacks and the Bandidos — were having a meeting at a Twin Peaks restaurant in Waco, Texas. The two groups got into a fight, and a shootout occurred. Nine people were killed; 17 were injured, and 177 people were arrested with $1 million bonds set. The Waco police allowed the gang members to sit on the ground without handcuffs, and some were even allowed to use their phones.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top