Michael Slager, Cop Who Fatally Shot Walter Scott, Indicted by Grand Jury on Murder Charge

2015-04-07T233714Z_01_TOR910R_RTRIDSP_3_USA-SOUTH-CAROLINA-SHOOTING-034Roughly two months after former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager fatally shot unarmed 50-year-old Walter Scott, a grand jury has decided to indict him on a murder charge that could land him behind bars for more than 30 years.

South Carolina prosecutor Scarlett Wilson made the announcement Monday that Slager had been officially charged with murder — a ruling that may have never happened without a bystander’s video of the shooting.

But while the video evidence is pretty damning, Wilson added that the real work has just begun.

“We will move forward now in preparing our case,” Wilson said. “Really the prosecution work has just begun.”

The prosecution hopes to prove that Slager killed Scott “with malice aforethought.”

While Slager’s freedom is still hanging in the balance, his career as a police officer has already been decided.

The fatal shooting cost the 33-year-old his job after it was revealed that his original report of what happened was less than honest.

Slager insisted that he fired after a physical altercation with Scott who allegedly took the officer’s Taser.

Cellphone video of the incident failed to show any altercation but captured Slager firing several times at Scott as he ran away.

After Scott finally fell to the ground, Slager is seen dropping a dark object, believed to be the Taser, next to Scott’s body.

Scott was pronounced dead on the scene as Slager shared a light-hearted conversation with colleagues about the entire situation that was captured on police dash cams.

All the video evidence of the incident added to already growing frustrations around the country about police brutality, particularly when Black citizens are being targeted.

While the indictment isn’t a promise that justice will be served, it is a glimmer of hope for Scott’s family.

More arrests in Walter Scott shooting“The Scott family is as happy as can be,” Chris Stewart, the Scott family’s attorney, told The Guardian. “But of course the indictment does not make them whole for the loss they have suffered.”

The attorney also expressed that the family is grateful at least that the “wheels of justice are turning the right way.”

Slager’s legal team, on the other hand, has decided to remain tight-lipped about the indictment.

“Until we have an opportunity to fully evaluate the state’s case and to compare it with our own investigation we will not be commenting on any aspect of the case,” Andrew Savage, Slager’s attorney, said.

As for Slager’s hopes of getting the case moved to another jurisdiction to prevent any bias, Wilson believes that request will fall on deaf ears.

“I feel sure the people of Charleston County can decide it,” Wilson said. “The issue is not whether or not someone has heard of this case. The issue is whether they can put everything they’ve heard aside and make a decision based on the facts and evidence presented in court.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top