10 Fascinating Facts about the Zulu’s Victory Over the British at the Battle of Isandlwana

 

King Shaka

Shaka Zulu inspired the Zulu victory.

The Zulu battle formation utilized to win the battle, entitled “horns of the beast,” is believed to be invented by the notorious Shaka kaSenzangakhona, also known as Shaka Zulu, the most prominent ruler ever of the Zulu Kingdom. According to Britishbattles.com, in regards to this formation, “the main body of the army delivered a frontal assault, called the ‘loins’, while the ‘horns’ spread out behind each of the enemy’s flanks and delivered the secondary and often fatal attack in the enemy’s rear.”

Défense de Rorke's Drift

There was a cover-up of the British defeat.

There have been a number of different efforts to cover up the defeat of the British at the Battle of Isandlwana. Dr. Saul David confirms that, initially, Lord Chelmsford, who was to blame for the loss, “[buried] all the evidence that could be used against him.” He silenced witnesses that could testify against him, claimed that there was a shortage of ammunition, and professed that Colonel Durnford, who had died, did not follow his orders. In addition, David explains that the British victory at Rorke’s Drift, which occurred on the same day as the Battle of Isandlwana, was “rewarded by Queen Victoria’s government with no fewer than 11 Victoria Crosses, and was later immortalized by the film Zulu (1964), directed by Cy Endfield.” He goes on to point out that people often “exaggerate the importance of Rorke’s Drift in the hope of reducing the impact of Isandlwana.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top