Trending Topics

Segregation at Core of Deeply Rooted Issues in lmpoverished Communities, but Real Solution Remains Elusive

043012-national-la-riots-currentTwo of the communities that were the sites of massive protests and riots following the death of Black citizens were two of the most segregated communities in the entire country — Baltimore and St. Louis, the major city near Ferguson, Missouri.

The more researchers, reporters and officials examine such cities, the more aware they become of the deeply rooted issues that have left the cities’ residents trapped in poverty.

Perhaps one of the biggest issues is that of segregation.

The Equality Opportunity Project of Harvard University recently released two papers that unveiled the true ugliness of segregation and how it plagued the lives of its young victims.

According to the report, in a city like Baltimore, found to be the worst large city in the country for poor children when it comes to income mobility, a child’s future earnings can tumble by 0.7 percent every year they spend in that city.

Children who have been in the city since birth tend to total up an earnings penalty of roughly 14 percent, according to researchers Raj Chetty and Nathaniel Hendren.

“Geography is not quite destiny,” The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson writes. “But neighborhoods can drastically shape the economic prospects of those who grow up there. One hour south on the I-95 of Baltimore is Fairfax, Virginia, one of the 10 best large counties for low-income children. Growing up in Fairfax for 18 years raises a typical low-income child’s household earnings by 11 percent by the time he’s in early adulthood. All else equal, the difference between growing up in Fairfax rather than Baltimore, these studies say, amounts to hundreds of thousands of dollars of lifetime earnings.”

Fairfax has a predominantly white population with less than 10 percent of its residents being Black.

That’s the ugly reality of segregation. It’s not just about being separated, but also the vast difference of opportunities that exist for those in a predominantly white community when compared to a predominantly Black community.

That fact is not new and it’s not surprising, and it doesn’t warrant a new chapter of discussions about segregation.

What does warrant the igniting of a new conversation is the one-dimensional approach to solving the problems caused by segregation.

Historically, the approach has been to simply plop more Black families in neighborhoods that provided better opportunities and economic stability — in other words, relocate them to predominantly white communities.

This move has historically been done through government voucher programs that give selected residents a set amount of time to find property in high-opportunity neighborhoods, but such programs still don’t provide a thorough solution.

Rather than taking an approach that asks “how to move Black families to better areas” it seems there needs to be more exploration of a plan that asks “how do we improve the neighborhoods that are currently trapped in poverty and have little access to good schools and are being plagued by crime.”

Many families have already planted their roots in some of these impoverished communities and find it emotionally taxing to leave such ties behind even if it’s in order to seek better opportunity elsewhere.

“When it came down to it, a lot of them had lived there for generations, and they wanted to go somewhere comfortable and familiar,” said Susan Popkin, a scholar at the Urban Institute that has studied where residents moved after receiving vouchers under housing mobility programs in Chicago. “Unless they had a connection, they weren’t interested in going any further.”

Not to mention that even better economic opportunities don’t always create better environments for Black youths.

Segregation In many cases, Black families who relocated were in school districts that were overwhelmingly white and placed the youths in a situation where they were faced with discrimination or just felt out of place.

This is not to detract from the fact that many of the families who were relocated as a part of such voucher programs did see an increase in certain opportunities.

Their students were excelling and they were able to quickly find better employment opportunities, but why did they have to move to a suburban area to find such opportunity? Why were they being asked to run away from their communities in order to have the decent lifestyle that one would think would be afforded to all Americans?

What about the families who can’t afford to simply pick up their lives and relocate to a new neighborhood?

“It needs to be a two-pronged approach,” University of Illinois professor Ruby Mendenhall told The Atlantic. “You can’t ignore what happens in these neighborhoods.”

Popkin added that access to quality housing needs to see a drastic increase in low-income communities and officials should find an obligation to create changes in such communities that have been plagued by years of discriminatory practices in housing that helped usher the communities to their demise.

Not to mention the approach of relocating families completely ignores the historical problem of “white flight,” in which white families tend to relocate in masses once families from low-income areas start moving into their neighborhoods.

So while the idea of integration through vouchers and other relocation methods may have nothing but good intentions, it is, nonetheless, a quick solution that isn’t likely to stand the test of time if there isn’t a drastic refocus on fixing communities like Baltimore and St. Louis rather than just helping people run away from them.

What people are saying

2 thoughts on “Segregation at Core of Deeply Rooted Issues in lmpoverished Communities, but Real Solution Remains Elusive

  1. Bill Evans says:

    Educational discipline is sorely missing in most of our poor black communities because the basic necessities are always in emergency/crisis mode. Some serious and check points within our own race is needed. The Black Panthers food and headstart program was/ has been the only self generated black grass roots program that's lasted. But because their radical gun toting image really frighten middle America, the FBI infiltrated/destroyed their most radical leaders. But thank God their "headstart" program was implemented amongst all poor communities. The only way we're going stop generational welfare, is through a rigid education programs. Something like minority boarding schools at the beginning of our education. Now, todays kids are worse off because no one is left back irregardless of their grades/attendance.

  2. Nixon Manuel says:

    The articles makes it sound like the problem is segregation, when on a national and historic scale the real problem may be the consequences of Integration, which dismantled Negro townships, banks, insurance companies, taxis, movie theaters, markets, restaurants, schools, colleges and other institutions. And that transition to Intgregation through the Civil Rights movement was a last resort compromise against Whites incited with jealousy often via the KKK into burning down Negro townships, banks, insurance companies, taxis, movie theaters, markets, restaurants, schools, colleges, newspapers and other institutions. Any over 70 will remember Blacks already had all thier own and recovered well from slavery as a community–a real community with some townships having plumbing and other utilities before thier White neighbors. Some Black towns flourished after the war, and Black school teachers were known, by many, to be more skills-oriented, than thier equivalents in mainsteam institutions–such as those of Tuskegee Institute. Our businesses and towns were constantly attacked or residents lynched for doing a little better than a White neighbor. These attacks caused The Great Migration–where those inspired by the great Black journalist Ida B Wells and many other Blacks migrated to the West and still other Blacks, such as my business woman, former childhood slave, great, great grandmother migrated here to the North from NC. African-Americans fought for Integration because, my recent ancestors must have felt, we were pushed into a corner with no other choices. They wouldn't leave us alone, so we figured if we worked in thier business instead, maybe they wouldn't burn those down just because we're in the building. This article may be flawed, because it seems to skip all our successes, and it makes it sound like we've been doing bad ever since slavery–not exactly true!

Leave a Reply

Back to top